
Garnet
High-performance remote cache-store
The Lens
Your existing Redis clients work with it out of the box.
Free and open source under MIT. Garnet's key selling points: it uses Microsoft's FASTER storage engine under the hood, which is designed for modern SSDs and multi-core CPUs. Benchmarks show significantly higher throughput than Redis for both reads and writes, especially on machines with NVMe drives and many cores. It supports the most common Redis commands, Lua scripting, pub/sub, and cluster mode.
No paid tier exists. Microsoft released this as a research-backed open source project. Solo/small teams: stick with Redis unless you have a specific performance bottleneck. Growing teams on .NET stacks: natural fit. Anyone with NVMe hardware and high-throughput requirements: worth benchmarking against Redis and KeyDB.
The catch: it's new. Released in early 2024, the Redis command coverage isn't 100%. Some less common commands and modules aren't supported yet. The community is small compared to Redis's massive ecosystem. If your application uses Redis Streams, RedisJSON, or RediSearch modules, Garnet doesn't support those. And running a .NET runtime for your cache layer might feel odd if your stack is otherwise non-.NET.
Free vs Self-Hosted vs Paid
fully free### Fully Free
Garnet is 100% free and open source under MIT License. No paid tier, no managed cloud offering from Microsoft (yet).
### Self-Hosted Setup
Docker or build from source with .NET 8. Single binary deployment. Configuration via command-line arguments or config file. Redis-compatible. Point your Redis client at it. The .NET runtime is bundled in the Docker image.
### What You Get for $0
- Redis protocol compatibility (RESP2/RESP3) - FASTER storage engine (SSD-optimized) - Multi-threaded architecture - Pub/Sub - Lua scripting - Cluster mode - TLS support - ACL (access control lists)
### The Math
Garnet: $0. Redis: $0. KeyDB: $0. All three are free to self-host. The difference is performance characteristics. On modern NVMe hardware with many cores, Garnet benchmarks at 2-10x Redis throughput in Microsoft's tests. Your mileage depends on workload. Benchmark with your actual access patterns.
### Verdict
Free and promising, but young. Use if you have performance requirements that Redis can't meet on your hardware, or if you're in a .NET ecosystem.
Free. The real question isn't cost; it's whether the Redis command coverage matches your needs.
Similar Tools
About
- Stars
- 11,792
- Forks
- 646
Explore Further
More tools in the directory
Get tools like this delivered weekly
The Open Source Drop — the best new open source tools, analyzed. Free.




