7 open source tools compared. Sorted by stars. Scroll down for our analysis.
| Tool | Stars | Velocity | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
OpenFaaS Serverless Functions Made Simple | 26.1k | - | 83 |
Fission Fast and Simple Serverless Functions for Kubernetes. | 8.9k | - | 61 |
Apache OpenWhisk Apache OpenWhisk is an open source serverless cloud platform. | 6.8k | - | 63 |
Nuclio High-Performance Serverless event and data processing platform. | 5.7k | +4/wk | 61 |
| 1.0k | - | 65 | |
| 943 | - | 61 | |
| 547 | - | 60 |
Stay ahead of the category
New tools and momentum shifts, every Wednesday.
OpenFaaS lets you deploy functions to any Kubernetes or Docker Swarm cluster without locking into AWS Lambda or Google Cloud Functions. Write a function in any language, package it as a container, deploy it, and OpenFaaS handles scaling, routing, and health checks. Go, mixed licensing (Community Edition is MIT, Pro is commercial). The architecture is straightforward: a gateway routes requests to function pods, the autoscaler adjusts replicas based on demand, and Prometheus provides metrics. Supports async invocation via NATS for long-running tasks. Community Edition (CE) is free and covers the core: deploy functions, auto-scale, invoke via HTTP or async. It works. But the Pro tier gates features that matter at scale: scale-to-zero (functions that shut down when idle), single sign-on, detailed dashboard, retry policies, and Kafka event triggers. Pro pricing starts at $295/mo for 1 installation. Enterprise is custom. Solo developers: CE is fine for personal projects. Run it on a $10/mo VPS or your home lab. Small teams: CE works but you'll feel the missing scale-to-zero quickly; idle functions eating resources adds up. Medium to large: Pro is where OpenFaaS becomes production-viable. The catch: the serverless-on-your-own-infra space is niche. If you're already on AWS, Lambda is simpler. If you need Kubernetes functions specifically, Knative is fully open source with scale-to-zero included. OpenFaaS Pro's pricing makes sense only if you're committed to self-hosted serverless and want a polished developer experience.
Fission is Kubernetes-native serverless without the OpenWhisk-grade ops burden. Drop functions in Node, Python, Ruby, Go, PHP, Bash, or any Linux executable, set HTTP, message-queue, or scheduled triggers, and Fission's pool of warm containers serves them with cold starts around 100ms. Apple, Unilever, BD, and Babylon Health run it in production. Install is fast for Kubernetes-comfortable teams: three commands gets you environment setup and your first function deployed. The philosophy is straightforward: Kubernetes is the right place for serverless because real applications need both functions and conventional services, and Kubernetes already unifies monitoring, logging, and operations. Active maintenance with v1.22.0 shipped in December. Solo developers on Kubernetes: this is the cleanest open source serverless option. Small teams already running k8s: install it, the operational story is contained. Large teams running production serverless on Kubernetes: evaluate it against Knative; Fission tends to win on simplicity, Knative wins on ecosystem and Cloud Run portability. The catch: you need Kubernetes. If your platform doesn't already have a cluster, Fission is adding two operational problems instead of one. Knative has the same constraint; Modal and Vercel Functions don't. Pick the right tool for where you are.
Apache OpenWhisk is the elder statesman of open source serverless platforms. It powered IBM Cloud Functions for years, runs at Apache governance, and supports a wide range of runtimes: Node, Python, Go, Swift, PHP, Ruby, dotnet, Rust, Scala, Java, and Docker images. Version 2.0.0 shipped last spring, and the project recently migrated to Apache Pekko after Akka changed licenses. Still alive, still active. Deployment is the real question. You can run a Java standalone for local dev, or stand up a Kubernetes-native cluster for production. Most platform teams pick OpenFaaS or Knative for simpler operational stories; OpenWhisk is heavier, with more components (controller, invoker, Kafka, CouchDB) to manage. The reward is a mature, battle-tested platform. Solo developers: probably skip. The setup overhead doesn't pay off until you're running real production workloads. Small teams: evaluate OpenFaaS or Knative first; come here if those don't fit. Large teams running enterprise workloads who want the Apache Software Foundation backing and broad runtime support: OpenWhisk is worth the ops investment. The catch: more moving parts than the alternatives. Operating a production OpenWhisk cluster requires managing Kafka, CouchDB, and the controller/invoker split. The platform is excellent; the day-two operations are not trivial.
Nuclio is the serverless platform built for data-heavy workloads. Where OpenFaaS and Knative target generic HTTP functions, Nuclio is tuned for real-time event processing: streaming ingest, ML inference, image and video pipelines, and anything that needs to push hundreds of thousands of records per second. Iguazio created it, and they claim 10-100x throughput over competing serverless engines for those workloads. Apache 2.0, runs on Docker, Kubernetes, or edge devices, with first-class GPU support and scale-to-zero. Triggers cover HTTP, Kafka, Kinesis, NATS, S3 events, and the data integrations the ML world cares about. The Jupyter and Kubeflow integrations are first-class; data scientists deploy functions from notebooks without writing Kubernetes manifests. Solo data scientists and small ML teams: this is genuinely useful. It's the closest open source thing to a managed Modal or Replicate for serverless inference. Large teams with serious data science operations: pair it with MLRun and Kubeflow for a complete MLOps stack. Teams that just want HTTP functions: use OpenFaaS or Knative, you don't need Nuclio's complexity. The catch: this is open core. Nuclio is the open source layer; the production-grade enterprise experience lives inside Iguazio's commercial Data Science Platform. The OSS version is real and complete enough to run in production, but the most polished operations are upsold.
This plugin lets you define AWS Step Functions directly in your serverless.yml. Instead of going to the AWS console and clicking through the Step Functions designer, you write the state machine definition alongside your Lambda code and deploy it all together. The plugin is free and open source. It doesn't have its own license file clearly posted, but it's a community plugin for the Serverless Framework ecosystem. There's nothing to host. It's a Serverless Framework plugin: `npm install` it, add it to your config, and it deploys Step Functions state machines to AWS when you run `serverless deploy`. The ops burden is trivial because AWS manages the actual Step Functions infrastructure. Solo developers: if you're already on Serverless Framework and need Step Functions, this saves you from writing CloudFormation by hand. Small teams: same story: it keeps your workflow definitions in version control next to your functions. Beyond that: at scale, you might prefer CDK or Terraform for more control. The catch: this is tightly coupled to the Serverless Framework. If you move to CDK, SAM, or SST for your infrastructure, this plugin doesn't come with you. Also, development has slowed; the last meaningful updates were a while back. It works, but don't expect rapid feature additions.
Supabase Edge Runtime is the engine that powers Supabase Edge Functions. It lets you run TypeScript/JavaScript functions at the edge using Deno. If you're building on Supabase and need serverless functions that respond fast from locations close to your users, this is what runs them under the hood. Free and open source under MIT. You can self-host it to run Deno-based edge functions on your own infrastructure. It handles request routing, worker isolation, and memory management for function execution. As part of the Supabase platform, you get 500K function invocations/month free on their hosted service. Beyond that, it's $2 per million invocations on the Pro plan ($25/mo base). Supabase users: use Edge Functions through the platform, the free tier is generous. Non-Supabase users: look at Deno Deploy or Cloudflare Workers instead. The catch: this is a specialized runtime, not a general-purpose serverless platform. It's tightly coupled to the Supabase ecosystem. If you're not using Supabase, you'd be better off with Deno Deploy directly, Cloudflare Workers, or Vercel Edge Functions. Self-hosting it standalone is possible but there's limited documentation for that use case.
This is the framework that makes it work. It gives you a local development server and the scaffolding to write HTTP and CloudEvent handlers that deploy directly to Cloud Functions or Cloud Run. Apache 2.0, Google-maintained. It's a thin layer. You write a Dart function, annotate it, and the framework handles the HTTP server, request parsing, and function routing. Works with the Dart package ecosystem via pub.dev. Fully free. No paid tier exists. It's a framework, not a service. You pay Google Cloud for compute when you deploy, but the framework itself costs nothing. Solo Dart developers experimenting with serverless: useful if you're committed to Dart on the backend. Small teams: only makes sense if your whole stack is Dart (Flutter front + Dart backend). Larger teams: almost certainly using Node, Python, or Go for Cloud Functions already. The catch: the Dart serverless ecosystem is tiny, and zero velocity tells you adoption is niche. If your function needs packages that don't exist in Dart, you're stuck. Node.js or Python Cloud Functions have 100x the community support.